Your thoughts on dowel-rod frames

Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum

Help Support Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ugcheleuce

Field Bee
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
669
Reaction score
1
Location
Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Hive Type
National
Number of Hives
7-10
Hello everyone

This week (!) I'm thinking about making my own frames. The frames that are used in my region (Holland) tend to be a rather simple affair, compared to some of the sophisticated designs that I have seen used in the UK and US, and my dowel-rod frames will be equally simple things.

In my proposed dowel-rod frames, the top-bar and probably also the bottom-bar would be made from normal little planks but the side-bars would be made from dowels. Attaching the dowels would be quite simple -- simply drill a hole into the plank and stick the dowel through it (glued), and optionally drive a nail through the top or bottom of the dowel to make it expand a bit.

What are your thoughts about this?

I've only ever seen two hive designs that use dowel-rod frames -- the one is the Jackson hive that uses a very thick dowel-rod for the side-bars and a thin dowel-rod for the bottom bar, and the Golden hive that uses two dowel-rods instead of side-bars (and sometimes also a vertical rod in the centre of the frame), but with a standard little plank for the bottom-bar. The frames in the Golden hive seemed to use about 9 mm thick rods, whereas the rods in the Jackson hive look like they could be 15-20 mm thick.

At first I thought that I could use 7 mm thick rods, but once you hold the rod in your hands you realise that there is a big difference between 7 mm and 9 mm, with regard to strength! I'm not sure how big the hole must be that I should drill if I want to fit a 9 mm rod into it -- can anyone give me some clue here (i.e. what size drill bit)?

The boxes that I'm thinking of making these frames for are not a standard size, and they're quite small, so the frames don't need to carry much weight. My frames will likely be 33 cm x 22 cm.

Seeing that I'm a lazy mutt, I sought out ready-cut wood for this project (instead of cutting scraps to size, which would require tools that I don't have). At the local wood store I'm presented with a choice of four types of wood for the top-bar and bottom-bar, namely:

7x18mm norway spruce (vurenhout)
MOR 63.0, MOE 9.7
EUR 3.19 / 2100mm

8x26mm rubra oak (eikenhout)
MOR 99.2, MOE 12.14
EUR 4.79 / 2100mm

8x26mm european beech (beukenhout)
MOR 110.1, MOE 14.31
EUR 4.79 / 2100mm

15x20mm scots pine (grenenhout)
MOR 83.3, MOE 10.08
EUR 4.49 / 2100mm

The rods are scots pine and they're cheap:

7mm dia = EUR 1.79 / 2700mm
9mm dia = EUR 2.39 / 2700mm

Now the question is:

Would you trust a frame whose top-bar is only 7 mm thick? What if that top-bar was made not from pine or spruce but from beech or oak -- would that make you more likely to accept a top-bar that thin? Or should I just go for the thickest wood I can find, i.e. 15 mm thick, even if it's the weakest wood?

These frames won't be cheaper than frames made from the usual materials -- they'll be about three times as dear, in fact. But since they're a custom size, I might as well investigate the options.

Finally, something not quite on-topic here, but: these frames will likely be lugless, and to make them easier to handle, I was thinking of doubling up the top-bar so that it consist of two little planks with a bee-space sized space between them. Theoretically the bees won't build anything in that long hole, and it would make it much easier to handle the frame. If you know that the top-bar would be doubled-up, would that change your feelings about the thickness of the wood being used for the top-bar?

Thanks for reading my random thoughts. What are yours?

Samuel
 
Any chance of photos of the other frames you refer to.

I could not find a nice photo of Golden Hive frames, but you can see an approximation of it on this Sketchup page. The Jackson Hive frames can be seen on the images on this Beeware page.

Here are two images that show how simple the Dutch simplex frames are, but I did not originally post them because I did originally post them in another forum about this same topic, and the discussion derailled almost instantly into a discussion of those images:

http://i57.tinypic.com/2h2lf9c.jpg
http://i59.tinypic.com/o90lmg.jpg

Images of the wood that I saw at the wood store are here (not interesting):
http://wikisend.com/download/358464/dowel-rod frame images.zip

Samuel
 
Delon used sides of wire...
Dowels? Same thing...

The wire doesn't always stop the bees from continuing beyond the edge of the frame, whereas I suspect dowels would be more successful in that. I think wire is more for Warre-type of hives. Wire is cheaper, though -- a 33x22cm frame takes about 1 m of wire, and 100 m of plasticised 3 mm wire is about EUR 30.
 
Bees don't stop at the end of frames - even if wood - if there is more space...
 
you have forgotten the issue of beespace, as suggested above.

proper frames in a well made brood box have 1 or 2 beespaces all around.

your dowels would provide foci for brace comb building.

really good presentation on the issue at the BBKA convention 2 years back.

take a careful look at the dimensions of standard Hoffman frames, with wide top bars, and work out the spacing between frames at top and bottom.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top